Change in serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels with high-efficacy and low-efficacy early therapy in multiple sclerosis
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Neurofilament light chain (NfL) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) outcomes. We compare how high-efficacy early therapy (HEET) and lower-efficacy early therapy (LEET) affect serum NfL and GFAP at the initiation of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) and in the years afterwards. METHODS: Adults diagnosed with MS within 5 years of symptom onset at our centre were eligible. Records from DMT-naïve patients with serum NfL and GFAP drawn in the year before treatment start and follow-up samples 6-36 months after treatment initiation were included in the 'pre-initiation' cohort. Those with baselines after DMT initiation and follow-up samples within 5 years were included in the 'post-initiation' cohort. RESULTS: There were 155 pre-initiation patients (HEET: 85, LEET: 70) and 213 post-initiation (HEET: 55, LEET: 158). NfL levels were reduced following DMT initiation but did not differ significantly between HEET and LEET in either cohort. GFAP was not substantially impacted by either HEET or LEET. CONCLUSION: The difference in NfL reduction with HEET and LEET may be smaller than anticipated, perhaps reflecting that disease activity risk is considered in real-world DMT selection. There is minimal impact of HEET or LEET on GFAP, at least over several years.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Change in serum neurofilament light chain and glial fibrillary acidic protein levels with high-efficacy and low-efficacy early therapy in multiple sclerosis
- Date Crossref
- 28/04/2025
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.