Rational Design of Single‐Domain Antibodies Targeting the Central Nervous System Neurite Outgrowth Inhibitor Nogo‐A
Résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT The oligodendrocyte‐derived membrane protein Nogo‐A is one of the most potent inhibitors of neurite growth and regeneration in the adult mammalian central nervous system (CNS). It has been recently shown that the administration of an antibody targeting Nogo‐A promoted functional and histopathological recovery in animal models of multiple sclerosis (MS), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), spinal cord injury (SCI) and stroke. Based on these results, this study aims to develop rationally designed nanobodies to target Nogo‐A for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes, as these antibody variants offer therapeutic opportunities for their small size and CNS penetrance. In the first step of our approach, we carried out computational and functional analyses of Nogo‐A to identify targetable epitopes. We then rationally designed epitope‐specific CDR3 loops and grafted them onto a pre‐optimised human VHH scaffold to create a panel of nanobodies. These designed nanobodies were then screened in terms of their thermostability, solubility and binding affinity towards the target antigen to select the best candidate. In this way, we identified a nanobody that binds to an epitope within the ectodomain of human Nogo‐A. These results indicate that the rational design method used in this study may facilitate the initial stages of nanobody development for Nogo‐A detection and inhibition for CNS therapeutic applications.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Rational Design of Single‐Domain Antibodies Targeting the Central Nervous System Neurite Outgrowth Inhibitor Nogo‐A
- Date Crossref
- 27/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.