CellPhePy: A python implementation of the CellPhe toolkit for automated cell phenotyping from microscopy time‐lapse videos
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We previously developed the CellPhe toolkit, an open-source R package for automated cell phenotyping from ptychography time-lapse videos. To align with the growing adoption of python-based image analysis tools and to enhance interoperability with widely used software for cell segmentation and tracking, we developed a python implementation of CellPhe, named CellPhePy. CellPhePy preserves all of the core functionality of the original toolkit, including single-cell phenotypic feature extraction, time-series analysis, feature selection and cell type classification. In addition, CellPhePy introduces significant enhancements, such as an improved method for identifying features that differentiate cell populations and extended support for multiclass classification, broadening its analytical capabilities. Notably, the CellPhePy package supports CellPose segmentation and TrackMate tracking, meaning that a set of microscopy images are the only required input with segmentation, tracking and feature extraction fully automated for downstream analysis, without reliance on external applications. The workflow's increased flexibility and modularity make it adaptable to different imaging modalities and fully customisable to address specific research questions. CellPhePy can be installed via PyPi or GitHub, and we also provide a CellPhePy GUI to aid user accessibility.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- CellPhePy: A python implementation of the CellPhe toolkit for automated cell phenotyping from microscopy time‐lapse videos
- Date Crossref
- 24/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.