Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Approaches for Predicting Thermomechanical Behavior of Shape Memory Polymers
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Thermomechanical constitutive modeling is crucial for understanding and designing shape memory polymers (SMPs) for advanced engineering applications. Traditional approaches are often time-consuming and computationally expensive which requires the development of more efficient and accurate methods. In this paper, we propose a Transformer-based deep learning model to predict the thermomechanical behavior of semicrys-talline two-way shape memory polymers (2W-SMPs) under thermomechanical cycles. By leveraging its ability to capture complex, time-dependent patterns, the framework accurately models the intricate relationships between polymer strain, time, temperature, and stress. A comparative analysis with other deep learning models demonstrates that the Transformer excels in accuracy and robustness by capturing intricate dependencies and non-linearities in the data. The test results demonstrate that our proposed Transformer model achieved a root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.3365, outperforms the traditional deep learning models such as the feedforward neural network (FNN), convolutional neural network (CNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) models which achieved RMSE values of 6.78, 17.35, and 13.85, respectively. This study highlights the potential of the Transformer model as a powerful tool for predicting material behavior and reducing the time and resources required for constitutive modeling.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Approaches for Predicting Thermomechanical Behavior of Shape Memory Polymers
- Date Crossref
- 22/03/2025
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.