Relative importance sampling for off-policy actor-critic in deep reinforcement learning
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Off-policy learning exhibits greater instability when compared to on-policy learning in reinforcement learning (RL). The difference in probability distribution between the target policy (π) and the behavior policy (b) is a major cause of instability. High variance also originates from distributional mismatch. The variation between the target policy's distribution and the behavior policy's distribution can be reduced using importance sampling (IS). However, importance sampling has high variance, which is exacerbated in sequential scenarios. We propose a smooth form of importance sampling, specifically relative importance sampling (RIS), which mitigates variance and stabilizes learning. To control variance, we alter the value of the smoothness parameter [Formula: see text] in RIS. We develop the first model-free relative importance sampling off-policy actor-critic (RIS-off-PAC) algorithms in RL using this strategy. Our method uses a network to generate the target policy (actor) and evaluate the current policy (π) using a value function (critic) based on behavior policy samples. Our algorithms are trained using behavior policy action values in the reward function, not target policy ones. Both the actor and critic are trained using deep neural networks. Our methods performed better than or equal to several state-of-the-art RL benchmarks on OpenAI Gym challenges and synthetic datasets.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Relative importance sampling for off-policy actor-critic in deep reinforcement learning
- Date Crossref
- 24/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.