Exploring the potential and limitations of deep learning and explainable AI for longitudinal life course analysis

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Understanding the complex interplay between life course exposures, such as adverse childhood experiences and environmental factors, and disease risk is essential for developing effective public health interventions. Traditional epidemiological methods, such as regression models and risk scoring, are limited in their ability to capture the non-linear and temporally dynamic nature of these relationships. Deep learning (DL) and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) are increasingly applied within healthcare settings to identify influential risk factors and enable personalised interventions. However, significant gaps remain in understanding their utility and limitations, especially for sparse longitudinal life course data and how the influential patterns identified using explainability are linked to underlying causal mechanisms. METHODS: We conducted a controlled simulation study to assess the performance of various state-of-the-art DL architectures including CNNs and (attention-based) RNNs against XGBoost and logistic regression. Input data was simulated to reflect a generic and generalisable scenario with different rules used to generate multiple realistic outcomes based upon epidemiological concepts. Multiple metrics were used to assess model performance in the presence of class imbalance and SHAP values were calculated. RESULTS: We find that DL methods can accurately detect dynamic relationships that baseline linear models and tree-based methods cannot. However, there is no one model that consistently outperforms the others across all scenarios. We further identify the superior performance of DL models in handling sparse feature availability over time compared to traditional machine learning approaches. Additionally, we examine the interpretability provided by SHAP values, demonstrating that these explanations often misalign with causal relationships, despite excellent predictive and calibrative performance. CONCLUSIONS: These insights provide a foundation for future research applying DL and XAI to life course data, highlighting the challenges associated with sparse healthcare data, and the critical need for advancing interpretability frameworks in personalised public health.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.