Education on loss to follow-up after newborn hearing screening in Thailand: a randomised controlled trial
Rattachement africain : th. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objective To assess whether bedside parental education improves the loss to follow-up (LTF) rate after undergoing universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) in Thailand.Design A randomised controlled trialStudy sample Parents of newborns who did not pass the first-stage hearing screening were included and randomly allocated to the control and intervention groups. For parents in the control group, nurses or nurse assistants provided verbal information on the UNHS at bedside. For parents in the intervention group, a physician provided detailed verbal and written information at bedside. LTF was defined as any referred newborns who did not attend the rescreening, diagnostic, or intervention stage by 1, 3 or 6 months of age.Results Among 5,148 newborns, 271 who did not pass the screening were included. The LTF rate in the intervention group (10.37%, 14/135 participants) was significantly lower than that in the control group (21.32%, 29/136 participants) in the intention-to-treat analysis (p = 0.021, 95% confidence interval: 1.6–20.3%). Nine and five infants with hearing loss in the intervention and control groups, respectively, were identified.Conclusion Bedside parental education provided by the physician, along with written information, could improve the LTF rate.This study was registered in the Thai Clinical Trials Registry (TCTR20210902008).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Education on loss to follow-up after newborn hearing screening in Thailand: a randomised controlled trial
- Date Crossref
- 23/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Prince of Songkla University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Faculty of Medicine Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Prince of Songkla University et Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery — Faculty of Medicine.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.