Neurophysiological Markers of Design-Induced Cognitive Changes: A Feasibility Study with Consumer-Grade Mobile EEG

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Evidence-based design aims to create healthy environments grounded in scientific data, yet the influence of spatial qualities on cognitive processes remains underexplored. Advances in neuroscience offer promising tools to address this gap while meeting both scientific and practical demands. Consumer-grade mobile EEG devices are increasingly used; however, their lack of transparency complicates output interpretation. Well-established EEG indicators from cognitive neuroscience may offer a more accessible and interpretable alternative. METHODS: This feasibility study explored the sensitivity of five established EEG power band ratios to cognitive shifts in response to subtle environmental design experiences. Twenty participants completed two crossover sessions in an office-like setting with nature-inspired versus urban-inspired design elements. Each session included controlled phases of focused on-screen cognitive task and off-screen breaks. RESULTS: Factorial analyses revealed no significant interaction effects of cognitive state and environmental exposure on EEG outcomes. Nonetheless, frontal (θ/β) and frontocentral (β/[α + θ]) ratios showed distinct patterns across cognitive states, with more pronounced contrasts in the nature-inspired compared to the urban-inspired design conditions. Conversely, occipital ([θ + α]/β), (θ/α), and (β/α) ratios remained consistent across exposures. Data triangulation with autonomic nervous system responses and performance metrics supported these observations. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that EEG power band ratios can capture brain-environment interactions. However, limitations of consumer-grade EEG devices challenge both scientific rigour and practical application. Refining methodological reliability could improve interpretability, supporting more transparent and robust data-driven design decisions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.