Outcomes of Grade 3 Carotid Dissections: A 7-Year Retrospective Analysis of Stroke, Stenosis, and Pseudoaneurysm Progression
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Grade 3 blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVIs), also known as pseudoaneurysms, are characterized by arterial wall injury forming a sac-like structure, which can sometimes be associated with stenosis and poses a substantial risk of ischemic stroke. This study evaluates the outcomes of traumatic Grade 3 internal carotid artery injuries treated at a single institution. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 33 patients with Grade 3 carotid dissections treated between 2015 and 2022. Primary outcomes included stenosis progression, pseudoaneurysm status, and stroke occurrence. RESULTS: At final imaging, 90.9 % of stenoses had resolved or improved, while 9.1 % remained unchanged or worsened. For pseudoaneurysms, 61 % had resolved or improved, while 39 % remained stable or worsened. Two patients (6.1 %) experienced strokes despite antiplatelet therapy, with one occurring early and one delayed. The majority (84.8 %) received conservative medical management, with only 9.1 % undergoing endovascular treatment. CONCLUSION: Grade 3 carotid dissections have variable outcomes, with most improving or resolving. However, the persistent risk of stroke and pseudoaneurysm progression emphasizes the need for vigilant long-term monitoring and reconsideration of optimal management strategies, particularly regarding the role of antiplatelet therapy and endovascular intervention.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Outcomes of Grade 3 Carotid Dissections: A 7-Year Retrospective Analysis of Stroke, Stenosis, and Pseudoaneurysm Progression
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.