Lapdoctor: Multicentre Validation of a Scoring System for Preoperative Evaluation of Difficulty of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy
Rattachement africain : it, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We previously developed and validated LAPDOCTOR (LAParoscopic-Donor-nephreCTomy-scORe), a novel scoring system for the preoperative assessment of the difficulty of living donor nephrectomy (LDN). To prove its significance, we extended our investigation to a prospective, multicenter, national study. Difficulty was assessed by the operating surgeon using a scale from 1 to 3 (1-standard, 2-moderately difficult, 3-very difficult) based on eight parameters: availability of laparoscopic space, mobilization of the colon, kidney, gonadal, adrenal and renal vein, renal artery, and ureter. Donor CT-scans were blindly reviewed by a radiologist, and the LAPDOCTOR scores were compared with the difficulty levels assigned by the surgeon to investigate the match rates. One hundred eighty-five donors were enrolled, with a mean age of 54 years (range 24-77), BMI 25 kg/m2 (range 17-35), and male/female 59/126. LDN was blindly scored as standard in 45% of the cases, moderately-difficult in 52%, and very-difficult in 3%. The agreement between the LAPDOCTOR and expert donor surgeons' rate in categorizing LDN into risk groups had a QWK of 0.711 (95% CI 0.577-0.844) with p < 0.001. The LAPDOCTOR enables precise preoperative determination of the difficulty of LDN, particularly in very difficult cases, and assessment of surgical risk in living kidney donors. Clinical Trial Notation: https://ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT05769686.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Lapdoctor: Multicentre Validation of a Scoring System for Preoperative Evaluation of Difficulty of Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy
- Date Crossref
- 23/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.