Capecitabine-Enhanced Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Phase II Non-Randomized Trial on Safety and Efficacy
Rattachement africain : ir, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Aim To evaluate the safety and efficacy of administering capecitabine concurrent with brachytherapy in advanced-stage cervical cancerMethods Eligible patients with FIGO stage IB2–IVA cervical cancer were enrolled in this phase II non-randomized trial. After external beam chemoradiotherapy (EBRT), patients received capecitabine alongside brachytherapy as radiosensitizer. The primary objective was to assess the tolerability of the combined regimen and its effect on one-year disease-free (DFS) and overall survival rates (OS).Results Of the 69 patients completed treatment, 18 were enrolled as intervention group and 51 served as controls. Both groups were matched in terms of comorbidities, stage, and response to EBRT. Overall, concurrent capecitabine administration during brachytherapy was safe. At one-year follow-up, one death was recorded in each group, with recurrence rates of 16.7% in the intervention group and 19.6% in the control group. One-year DFS was 82% (95% CI: 54%–98%) in the intervention group and 87% (95% CI: 72%–94%) in the control group, while one-year OS was 93% (95% CI: 53%–98%) and 97% (95% CI: 85%–99%), respectively (for both p < 0.05).Conclusion In conclusion, while capecitabine-augmented brachytherapy was demonstrated to be safe in patients with advanced cervical cancer, its addition did not yield significant improvements in DFS or OS.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Capecitabine-Enhanced Brachytherapy in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Phase II Non-Randomized Trial on Safety and Efficacy
- Date Crossref
- 21/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.