Effects of GLP ‐1 Receptor Agonists on Paediatric Population in a Real World Setting
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: Incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity is increasing in children. We aimed to observe the metabolic health effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in paediatric patients with T2DM in a real-world setting. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients aged 0 to 18 years with T2DM who were started on a GLP-1 receptor agonist between August 2019 and August 2023 and followed for up to 24 months was included in this study. RESULTS: 321 patients were included in the analysis. After 12 months of treatment with a GLP-1 receptor agonist, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was reduced by -1.04% ± 2.3% (p < 0.001). At 24 months, HbA1c was similar to baseline (8.3% ± 2.5% vs. 7.9% ± 2.5%, p = 0.24). There was a significant (p < 0.05) decrease in the use of metformin, basal insulin, and bolus insulin at one year which was sustained at the two-year follow-up for metformin (p = 0.002). Overall, there was no significant change in BMI nor other metabolic parameters while undergoing treatment with a GLP-1 receptor agonist. CONCLUSION: Paediatric patients with T2DM using GLP-1 receptor agonists experienced a significant decrease in HbA1c after 12 months of use, which was not sustained at 24 months. However, patients had a reduction in insulin and metformin use at 12 months. No significant impact was appreciated on BMI or other metabolic variables.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Effects of <scp>GLP</scp>‐1 Receptor Agonists on Paediatric Population in a Real World Setting
- Date Crossref
- 22/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.