Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Semantic Clinical Artificial Intelligence vs Native Large Language Model Performance on the USMLE

15Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Importance: Large language models (LLMs) are being implemented in health care. Enhanced accuracy and methods to maintain accuracy over time are needed to maximize LLM benefits. Objective: To evaluate whether LLM performance on the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) can be improved by including formally represented semantic clinical knowledge. Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness research study was conducted between June 2024 and February 2025 at the Department of Biomedical Informatics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, using sample questions from the USMLE Steps 1, 2, and 3. Intervention: Semantic clinical artificial intelligence (SCAI) was developed to insert formally represented semantic clinical knowledge into LLMs using retrieval augmented generation (RAG). Main Outcomes and Measures: The SCAI method was evaluated by comparing the performance of 3 Llama LLMs (13B, 70B, and 405B; Meta) with and without SCAI RAG on text-based questions from the USMLE Steps 1, 2, and 3. LLM accuracy for answering questions was determined by comparing the LLM output with the USMLE answer key. Results: The LLMs were tested on 87 questions in the USMLE Step 1, 103 in Step 2, and 123 in Step 3. The 13B LLM enhanced by SCAI RAG was associated with significantly improved performance on Steps 1 and 3 but only met the 60% passing threshold on Step 3 (74 questions correct [60.2%]). The 70B and 405B LLMs passed all the USMLE steps with and without SCAI RAG. The SCAI RAG 70B model scored 80 questions (92.0%) correctly on Step 1, 82 (79.6%) on Step 2, and 112 (91.1%) on Step 3. The SCAI RAG 405B model scored 79 (90.8%) correctly on Step 1, 87 (84.5%) on Step 2, and 117 (95.1%) on Step 3. Significant improvements associated with SCAI RAG were found for the 13B model on Steps 1 and 3, the 70B model on Step 2, and the 405B parameter model on Step 3. The 70B model was significantly better than the 13B model, and the 405B model was not significantly better than the 70B model. Conclusions and Relevance: In this comparative effectiveness research study, SCAI RAG was associated with significantly improved scores on the USMLE Steps 1, 2, and 3. The 13B model passed Step 3 with RAG, and the 70B and 405B models passed and scored well on Steps 1, 2, and 3 with or without augmentation. New forms of reasoning by LLMs, like semantic reasoning, have potential to improve the accuracy of LLM performance on important medical questions. Improving LLM performance in health care with targeted, up-to-date clinical knowledge is an important step in LLM implementation and acceptance.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Semantic Clinical Artificial Intelligence vs Native Large Language Model Performance on the USMLE
Date Crossref
22/04/2025
Éditeur
American Medical Association (AMA)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationRadiology practices and educationCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.