Hexavalent chromium and cellular senescence: A comprehensive analysis from chromate-exposed occupational population and chromate-inhaled mouse model
Résumé fourni par la source
Cellular senescence may predominantly drive the progression of early subclinical injury under conditions of low-dose, long-term occupational exposure. However, previous research has largely overlooked the cellular senescence induced by hexavalent chromium [Cr(VI)]. To bridge the gap, 304 workers from a chromate facility were enrolled, and a mouse model was used to confirm the effects of Cr(VI) on cellular senescence. A 2.7-fold increase in blood Cr was related to the changes of p53 [23.19 (13.06, 34.23)%], serum α-Klotho [11.45 (6.13, 17.04)%], adipsin [-14.11(-22.16, -5.24)%], leptin [-4.32(-6.99, -1.58)%] and resistin [-3.29(-5.54, -0.98)%]. There were significant correlations of blood Cr with DNA methylation of ELOVL2 and hTERT genes. Furthermore, methylation at hTERT Pos1, Pos2, Pos6, and Pos8 significantly mediated the relationship between blood Cr and p53. In the mouse model, we observed significantly higher mRNA expression levels of key genes in the p53/p21 and Rb/p16 pathways and senescence-associated β-galactosidase positive cell ratio in the exposed group. In conclusion, we found that p53 in human peripheral blood cells serves as a Cr(VI)-induced senescence biomarker, with α-Klotho upregulation and adipokines (adipsin, leptin, and resistin) downregulation indicating compensatory responses, as well as hTERT methylation partially mediating Cr(VI)-senescence association.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Hexavalent chromium and cellular senescence: A comprehensive analysis from chromate-exposed occupational population and chromate-inhaled mouse model
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.