A tiny amount of electrode additive breaks the dilemma of achieving high energy density and fast charging lithium-ion battery cathode
Le résumé fourni par la source
It is crucial to achieve high energy density and fast charging simultaneously for automotive lithium-ion batteries. The nickel-rich layered oxide LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 (NCM811) cathode enables high energy density due to its high theoretical capacity and high working voltage. However, the fast charging performance is compromised because the electrode-electrolyte interface kinetics deteriorates when working at high voltage. A new approach is proposed to solve this dilemma, where [60] Fullerenoacetic acid (C60-COOH) is used to tune the interface structure of the NCM811. The carboxylic acid functional group ensures preferential deposition of C60 onto the NCM811 surface through the reaction with the surface residual alkaline species/transition metals. An electronic and ionic conductive thin coating layer is formed on the NCM811 surface, which inhibits electrolyte decomposition and facilitates formation of high voltage stable cathode electrolyte interface. With 0.50 wt.‰ of C60-COOH, the NCM811 cathode exhibits significantly improved electrochemical performance at 4.6 V in terms of reversible capacity, and capacity retention ratio, where an exceptional fast charging/discharging performance at 10 C is demonstrated as well. This work is of great significance for promoting high energy density and fast charging automotive lithium-ion batteries.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A tiny amount of electrode additive breaks the dilemma of achieving high energy density and fast charging lithium-ion battery cathode
- Date Crossref
- 18/04/2025
- Éditeur
- OAE Publishing Inc.
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.