Meiofauna from Almirante Câmara Canyon and Its Adjacent Open Slope, Southwest Atlantic Ocean
Rattachement africain : br. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The patterns of meiofaunal distribution in a submarine canyon and adjacent open-slope habitats at Campos Basin, southwest Atlantic, were investigated. A total of eight stations was sampled, four inside the Canyon Almirante Câmara and four on the adjacent open slope. These stations represented four isobaths (400, 700, 1000, 1300 m) and were sampled during two distinct periods (2008, 2009). At each station, three replicates were obtained and sectioned into layers of 0–2, 2–5 and 5–10 cm. Nematoda was the most abundant group in both habitats, comprising more than 85% of the total meiofauna in both sampling periods. The density and assemblage structure of the meiofauna showed high variability between the 400 m isobath and the other three isobaths in the canyon habitat. These results reinforce the roles of habitat heterogeneity and the availability of food sources as key factors strongly influencing the deep-sea meiofauna in the southwest Atlantic Ocean. Phytopigments were significantly correlated with the two major meiofaunal groups (Nematoda and Copepoda), as well as with total meiofaunal density, only in the canyon habitat. On the adjacent open slope, only copepods showed a significant correlation with sediment characteristics (mean grain size and carbonates), suggesting that distinct environmental factors influence the distribution of meiofauna in the two habitats.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Meiofauna from Almirante Câmara Canyon and Its Adjacent Open Slope, Southwest Atlantic Ocean
- Date Crossref
- 17/04/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.