High‐performance hyperspectral remote sensing and machine learning algorithms for detection of blister blight in Camellia sinensis
Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Camellia sinensis is a widely cultivated crop that is harvested for two leaves and a bud. However, these soft tissues are highly susceptible to the infection known as Exobasidium vexans. This fungal disease reduces the quality and quantity of tea produced. The objective of the study was to develop a remote sensing‐based model that could be used to predict the severity of blister blight infections. The study was conducted on five tea varieties susceptible to blister blight infections and the hyperspectral data were collected from leaves with a handheld instrument. Spectral preprocessing algorithms that included Puchwein's and Honig's were applied to select calibration sets and perform feature selection, respectively. Four machine learning algorithms that included artificial neural network (ANN), random forest, k‐nearest neighbors, and support vector machine were compared. The result indicated that the ANN outperformed other machine learning models, achieving a training accuracy of 83% (kappa coefficient = 0.78) and a testing accuracy of 92% (kappa coefficient = 0.90). The classification model was tested on another set of Kangra Asha tea leaves, resulting in a classification accuracy of 90% (kappa coefficient = 0.86). Thus, machine learning methods provided a novel technique to identify blister blight disease in the tea crop.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- High‐performance hyperspectral remote sensing and machine learning algorithms for detection of blister blight in <i>Camellia sinensis</i>
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.