Prevalence and management of symptom diagnoses in children in general practice
Rattachement africain : nl, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To explore the prevalence of symptom diagnoses in children in general practice and the management strategies performed by GPs. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Participant data registered in a Dutch practice-based primary care research network (Family Medicine Network [FaMe-Net]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All episodes of care with at least 1 contact for a symptom diagnosis in 2018 as well as management strategies within each episode of care including the number and type of diagnostic interventions, therapeutic interventions, and referrals. RESULTS: Overall, 6162 children under 15 years of age and registered with GP practices were included in the cohort. Among them, 2767 (44.9%) had at least 1 contact with their GP for at least 1 symptom diagnosis, and 161 (2.6%) had at least 1 persistent symptom diagnosis. Constipation, wheezing, and weakness were the most commonly found persistent symptoms. For persistent symptom diagnoses, GPs indicated more therapeutic interventions (n=217, 40.1%) compared to diagnostic interventions (n=175, 32.3%) or referrals (n=149, 27.6%). CONCLUSION: Symptom diagnoses are highly prevalent in children in general practice. Future research should focus on which children are at risk of developing persistent symptom diagnoses and how to manage them.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prevalence and management of symptom diagnoses in children in general practice
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2025
- Éditeur
- The College of Family Physicians of Canada
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Radboud University Nijmegen pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Radboud University Medical Center pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
University Medical Center pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
Radboud University Nijmegen, Radboud University Medical Center et Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, avec 1 autre affiliation.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.