The first high frequency technosignature search survey with the Sardinia Radio Telescope
Rattachement africain : it, us, gb, ie. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The search for radio signals from technologically advanced extraterrestrial intelligence has traditionally focused around 1.4 GHz. In this paper, we extend the exploration into previously uncharted frequency space, presenting extensive observations at 6 GHz and pioneering the first survey at 18 GHz with the Sardinia Radio Telescope (SRT). Our strategy entailed rigorous observation sessions, totaling 73 h, directed towards the Galactic Center and 72 selected TESS targets—making this the most comprehensive high-frequency technosignature search to date. Our narrowband signal search found no definitive evidence of drifting signals that could suggest an extraterrestrial origin from the surveyed regions. Nevertheless, our efforts have enabled us to set new constraints on the presence of radio emissions from approximately 5 × 1 0 5 stars, establishing an isotropic radiated power limit of 1 . 8 × 1 0 19 W. We also provide a comparative analysis of the ’hits’ recorded across both frequencies to highlight the significance of pursuing technosignature searches at higher frequencies, where the spectral landscape is less congested and more conducive to detection. • First technosignature searches at 6 GHz and 18 GHz with the Sardinia Radio Telescope. • Searches for narrowband drifting signals in the Galactic Center and 72 TESS targets. • Set new constraints on extraterrestrial radio emissions, limiting isotropic power.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The first high frequency technosignature search survey with the Sardinia Radio Telescope
- Date Crossref
- 01/08/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.