Prevailing challenges in personalized treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a narrative review
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: The management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has advanced with recent therapies, yet optimizing treatment remains challenging due to disease heterogeneity and the growing number of options. Integrating systemic and local treatments requires a multidisciplinary approach to improve outcomes. AREA COVERED: This review summarizes recent developments in treatment for mRCC. Upfront immuno-oncology (IO)-based combinations have improved survival, though concerns about overtreatment and toxicity persist. While the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) has declined to some extent, it may still benefit well-selected patients. Metastasis-directed therapies, including metastasectomy and stereotactic radiotherapy, provide prognostic value, particularly for oligometastatic lesions or brain metastases. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) holds promise for personalized treatment but is currently limited by the lack of actionable mutations and predictive biomarkers. EXPERT OPINION: A personalized, multimodal approach is essential for optimizing mRCC management. Careful patient selection is key to balancing the benefits of treatment with the risks of toxicity. While CN and metastasis-directed therapies remain useful in select cases, advancing individualized care requires the development of validated biomarkers and broader application of CGP.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prevailing challenges in personalized treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a narrative review
- Date Crossref
- 14/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.