Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Impact of osteoprotective therapies on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in melanoma patients – A multicentre study from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOReg

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
22Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : de, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background Osteoprotective therapy (OT), including denosumab and bisphosphonates, is approved as supportive treatment for patients with solid tumors to prevent skeletal-related events from bone metastases. Preclinical studies and clinical studies/series suggested a synergistic effect of OT and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in metastatic melanoma patients with bone metastases. Therefore, we investigated this issue in a registry study. Methods Melanoma patients with bone metastases undergoing first-line therapy with ICI were retrospectively identified from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOReg. Information on OT was additionally requested from the participating centers. The primary study endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Results 180 patients were identified and analysed. Of those, 107 patients (59.4 %) received PD-1 monotherapy and 73 (40.6 %) dual ICI therapy (PD-1 + CTLA-4). 64 patients received additional an OT therapy (36 %) (OT pos ). The median follow-up was 22.6 months (95 % CI=18.2–27.1). There were no significant differences in demographics or clinical parameters between OT pos and OT neg patients. The DCR was comparable between groups (p = 0.758; OT pos = 23.3 % (95 % CI=12.7–35.1), OT neg = 25.5 % (95 % CI=17.0–35.2)). There was no significant difference observed between groups in PFS (p = 0.489; OT pos = 6.7 months (95 % CI=1.3–12.1), OT neg = 6.4 months (95 % CI=1.9–11.0)), in OS (p = 0.065; OT pos = 26.1 months (95 % CI=14.6–37.5), OT neg = 16.9 months (95 % CI=6.2–27.6)) and in TTNT (p = 0.891; OT pos = 18.4 months (95 % CI=10.9–25.9), OT neg = 21.5 months (95 % CI=7.8–35.1)). Summary The majority of melanoma patients with bone metastasis did not receive an OT. No significant effects of OT were observed on efficacy outcomes, including response, PFS, OS, and TTNT.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Impact of osteoprotective therapies on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibition in melanoma patients – A multicentre study from the prospective skin cancer registry ADOReg
Date Crossref
01/01/2025
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.