Correlation Between Self‐Management Behavior and Self‐Efficacy in Patients With Lower Extremity Arterial Disease
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) is a common condition that significantly impacts patients' quality of life and increases the risk of disability. Effective self-management is critical for patients with LEAD to improve health outcomes and prevent disease progression. This study aims to explore and analyze the internal correlation between self-management behavior and self-efficacy of patients with lower extremity artery disease. A convenience sampling method was used to select 146 patients with LEAD who visited the vascular surgery department in a hospital in Shanxi Province from January 2022 to December 2022. The Chronic Disease Self-Management Behavior Scale and the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale were used to assess patients' self-management behaviors and self-efficacy levels. Pearson correlation analysis was employed to explore the relationship between the two. The total self-management behavior score of 143 patients with LEAD was 17.64 ± 3.24. The total self-efficacy score was 33.24 ± 4.11. The total score of self-management behavior was positively correlated with the total score of self-efficacy. The self-management abilities of patients with LEAD are generally low. Healthcare providers should focus on enhancing self-management behaviors, boosting patients' confidence in managing their condition, correcting misconceptions, and providing targeted interventions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Correlation Between Self‐Management Behavior and Self‐Efficacy in Patients With Lower Extremity Arterial Disease
- Date Crossref
- 10/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.