Biomass Burning over Africa: How to Explain the Differences Observed Between the Different Emission Inventories?
Résumé fourni par la source
Biomass burning (BB) results from complex interactions between ecosystems, humans, and climate, releasing large amounts of gases and particles. Accurate BB emission estimates are essential for air quality, climate studies, and impact assessments. Various existing bottom-up BB emission inventories show significant discrepancies, varying by factors of 2 to 4 due to uncertainties in burned areas (BAs), emission factors (EFs), and vegetation parameters such as biomass density (BD) and burning efficiency (BE). Here, we investigate the role of vegetation parameters in these discrepancies in Africa. Two BB emission inventories, AMMABB-like (African Monsoon Multidisciplinary Analysis Biomass Burning) and GFED-like (Global Fire Emission Database) were developed for Organic Carbon (OC) and Black Carbon (BC). Both inventories used identical fire products, vegetation maps, and EF but different BD and BE values. Results highlight substantial differences in BD and BE, with relative gaps ranging from 44% to 85.12%, explaining the observed differences between BB emission inventories. Key vegetation classes responsible for BB emissions were identified. Discrepancies of 2.4 to 3.9 times were observed between AMMABB-like and GFED4-like, with higher values in the Southern Hemisphere. Better BD and BE estimates with regional distinctions for both hemispheres would improve BB emission accuracy in Africa.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Biomass Burning over Africa: How to Explain the Differences Observed Between the Different Emission Inventories?
- Date Crossref
- 10/04/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.