Anlotinib-associated pulmonary embolism in brainstem glioblastoma treatment: a case report
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary brain malignancy in adults. Diagnosis primarily relies on imaging techniques like CT scan and MRI, while pathological biopsy remains the diagnostic gold standard. Standard of care for newly diagnosed GBM includes maximal safe resection followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy, although prognosis remains poor. GBM patients are at heightened risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), with chemotherapy and targeted therapy further elevating this risk. Case summary: We report a case of a patient with atypical cranial imaging findings, where initial assessments at both an external hospital and our institution were equivocal. A definitive GBM diagnosis was achieved only after biopsy. GBMs are highly vascularized malignant tumors. Anlotinib, an anti-angiogenic multi-kinase inhibitor, has been used to treat GBM. Following diagnosis, the patient received anlotinib therapy and subsequently developed PE, suspected as an anlotinib-induced adverse event. Conclusion: Anlotinib may cause PE and should be used with caution. Clinicians should close coagulation monitoring following anlotinib treatment, including D-dimer testing and imaging (eg, CT), to ensure prompt diagnosis and timely treatment for PE. This case highlights the critical need for vigilant PE monitoring and prompt management in GBM patients on anlotinib therapy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Anlotinib-associated pulmonary embolism in brainstem glioblastoma treatment: a case report
- Date Crossref
- 09/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.