Phenological Study and Effect of Two Pollination Techniques on Groundnut Fruiting
Résumé fourni par la source
Arachis hypogaea Linné is an annual legume and is one of the most widely cultivated oilseeds in West Africa and even worldwide for its high oil content. However, the floral phenology of groundnut accessions and their typology are not fully known. Similarly, the reliable manual pollination technique used to cross-breed elite genotypes of Arachis hypogea is not sufficiently well known. With a view to improving the local yield of this crop, the present study was conducted to assess the morphological diversity of six accessions linked to floral biology, and to evaluate two manual pollination techniques A and B. The results showed morphological variability within accessions. Thus, except for flower length, the other characters (flower width; number of flowers per peduncle; time between flower bloom and pod maturity) significantly differentiated the 6 groundnut accessions. Then, accessions PA1-19, PA1-21, PA8-1, PA12-5, P12-7 and PA17-2 were differentiated by the four characters reflecting floral phenology. Technique B was more effective than technique A, with success rates of 61.35% and 42.04% respectively. This superiority of technique B could be explained by the presence of the carina during pollination. The combination of morphological and phenological floral characteristics showed that accessions PA1-21 and PA1-19 performed better. These accessions could be used in crosses based on the manual pollination technique identified, to create high-performance groundnut hybrids in Côte d’Ivoire.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Phenological Study and Effect of Two Pollination Techniques on Groundnut Fruiting
- Date Crossref
- 15/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Canadian Center of Science and Education
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.