Dimensionality reduction of genetic data using contrastive learning
Rattachement africain : se. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We introduce a framework for using contrastive learning for dimensionality reduction on genetic datasets to create principal component analysis (PCA)-like population visualizations. Contrastive learning is a self-supervised deep learning method that uses similarities between samples to train the neural network to discriminate between samples. Many of the advances in these types of models have been made for computer vision, but some common methodology does not translate well from image to genetic data. We define a loss function that outperforms loss functions commonly used in contrastive learning, and a data augmentation scheme tailored specifically towards SNP genotype datasets. We compare the performance of our method to PCA and contemporary nonlinear methods with respect to how well they preserve local and global structure, and how well they generalize to new data. Our method displays good preservation of global structure and has improved generalization properties over t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding, Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection, and popvae, while preserving relative distances between individuals to a high extent. A strength of the deep learning framework is the possibility of projecting new samples and fine-tuning to new datasets using a pretrained model without access to the original training data, and the ability to incorporate more domain-specific information in the model. We show examples of population classification on two datasets of dog and human genotypes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Dimensionality reduction of genetic data using contrastive learning
- Date Crossref
- 07/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.