Correlation between Alban\'s Test and Smartphone Cariogram App for Caries Risk Assessment in 4–13-year-old Children
Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Dental caries is a multifactorial disease and a dynamic process that can be prevented and reversed in its early stages. Risk assessment plays a crucial role in decision-making and treatment planning. Therefore, there is a need for a valid, reliable, economical, and chairside caries risk assessment tool for general and pediatric dentists. Aim: To correlate the Alban's test and smartphone Cariogram app for caries risk assessment in 4-13-year-old children. Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Faridabad. A total sample of 59 children, 4-13 years old, residing in Faridabad, were included. Salivary samples were collected and inoculated on BCG-Dextrose Agar. Caries activity was assessed using the Alban test. The caries risk profiles generated by the Cariogram software were compared with the Alban's test. Results: < 0.05). Conclusion: As the score of Alban's test increased (indicating more caries activity) at different points of time, the Cariogram result score, that is, the chance to avoid caries, decreased. Caries risk assessment tools play a very pivotal role in educating and motivating the parents and caretakers for preventive care of the children. How to cite this article: Correlation between Alban's Test and Smartphone Cariogram App for Caries Risk Assessment in 4-13-year-old Children. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2025;18(2):134-140.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Correlation between Alban\'s Test and Smartphone Cariogram App for Caries Risk Assessment in 4–13-year-old Children
- Date Crossref
- 20/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.