Twelve-month efficacy of carboxymethyl-chitosan in refractory knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial (PIONEER)
Résumé fourni par la source
Objectives: The 12-month efficacy and safety of a novel bioresorbable fluid implant based on CM-chitosan for intra-articular injection was evaluated in knee osteoarthritis (OA) patients with predictive factors of failure to viscosupplementation. Design: one) in reducing pain were evaluated compared Hylan G-F 20 (Synvisc-One). Efficacy was evaluated using the WOMAC scores, OMERACT-OARSI responder rates, TKA eligibility and events, patient and physician satisfaction. Results: At 6 months post-injection, mean WOMAC pain reduction vs. baseline was 69.4 ± 25.5 % for the CM-chitosan group and 66.3 ± 26.15 % for the Hylan G-F 20 group (non-inferiority p = 0.096; 95 % CI -16.94 %, 7.02 %). At 12 months, significant symptomatic improvement in both groups, with clinically important differences in WOMAC pain reduction in favor of CM-chitosan, were observed, including in the subgroups of patients with patellofemoral OA (Δ 11.5 %), obese patients (Δ 21.7 %) and patients eligible for TKA at baseline (Δ 13.5 %). CM-chitosan showed a high response rate (93.8 %), as well as high patient (93.8 %) and investigator (90.6 %) satisfaction. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: In this difficult-to-treat population, CM-chitosan was non-inferior to Hylan G-F 20, but did show clinically important, though not statistically significant, differences in pain reduction at 12 months. CM-chitosan was effective in improving OA symptoms and physical function for 12 months.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Twelve-month efficacy of carboxymethyl-chitosan in refractory knee osteoarthritis: A randomized controlled trial (PIONEER)
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.