Potential lead exposure from aluminum cooking pots in lower and middle-income countries
Résumé fourni par la source
Food cooked in pots produced from recycled aluminum can contain impurities including lead, especially in lower and middle-income countries (LMICs) where quality control may be limited. Our study analyzed 113 mostly new aluminum pots from 25 LMICs for total lead with an XRF and lab-based leachable lead to mimic the release of lead while cooking. Total lead concentrations in the pots ranged from < 5 ppm to almost 16,000 ppm, averaging 1600 ppm, with the highest total lead concentrations in pots from Vietnam, Pakistan, Indonesia, and India. Leachable lead concentrations ranged from < 1-2900 μg/L averaging 100 μg/L after boiling 4 % acetic acid for 2 h. Total and leachable lead concentrations were roughly proportional, with pots manufactured by casting leaching proportionally more lead compared to wrought pots manufactured from rolled aluminum. Optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy of selected leached pots indicated a heterogeneous distribution of lead in the aluminum matrix and pitting of the aluminum along preferential pathways. Modeling using U.S. EPA's All Ages Lead Model indicated that leachate concentrations > 250 μg/L, found in about one tenth of the pots tested, could result in blood lead levels that exceed the WHO's intervention threshold of 5 μg/dL in children and women of child-bearing age. This could be an overestimate, however, as laboratory leaching conditions were probably more aggressive than typical foods.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Potential lead exposure from aluminum cooking pots in lower and middle-income countries
- Date Crossref
- 01/07/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.