Sexual selection, genomic evolution and population fitness in Drosophila pseudoobscura
Rattachement africain : gb, us, se. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Sexual selection shapes the genome in unique ways. It is also likely to have significant fitness consequences, such as purging deleterious mutations from the genome or conversely maintaining genetic load in a population via sexual conflict. Here, we examined what the influence of sexual selection has on genomic variation potentially underlying population fitness using experimentally evolved Drosophila pseudoobscura populations. Sexual selection was manipulated by keeping replicate lines in elevated polyandry or strict monogamy for approximately 200 generations followed by individual-based sequencing. Using pi ( π ), fixation index ( F st )and recombination rate measures, we confirmed signatures of selection were not dispersed but mainly localized to the third and X chromosome. Overall mutational load was similar between lines but our analysis of the distribution of fitness effects revealed considerable variation between lines and chromosomes. Furthermore, we found that the distribution of transposable elements differs between the lines, with a higher load in monogamous lines. Our results suggest that complex interactions between purifying selection and sexual conflict are shaping the genome, particularly on chromosome 3 and the sex chromosome; sexual selection influences divergence across chromosomes but in a more complex way than proposed by simple ‘purging’ of deleterious loci.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Sexual selection, genomic evolution and population fitness in <i>Drosophila pseudoobscura</i>
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2025
- Éditeur
- The Royal Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.