Endoscopic Malleostapedotomy in Primary Stapes Surgery: Preliminary Results
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To describe the surgical steps in endoscopic malleostapedotomy as a primary intervention and to evaluate the audiologic and surgical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical capsule report. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Fourteen patients (10 males and 4 females) who underwent endoscopic malleostapedotomy as a primary intervention between April 2017 and July 2023 were enrolled in this study. Demographic data, surgical information, preoperative and postoperative pure-tone averages and air bone gaps, intraoperative and postoperative complications, and follow-up data were summarized and gathered in a database for further consideration and analysis. RESULTS: During endoscopic ear surgery, congenital ossicular chain malformation was present in 13 cases and tympanosclerosis in 1 case. The postoperative air-bone gap improved significantly compared with the preoperative gap (18.4 versus 47.4 dB HL, respectively), and the mean air-bone gap closure was 29 dB HL. In 14% of cases, the observed postoperative air-bone gap was less than 10 dB HL, and in 64%, it was between 11 and 20 dB HL. An ABG closure lower than 20 dB HL was achieved in a total of 78% of patients. There was no sensorineural hearing loss or persistent vertigo in the study sample. Two cases of prosthesis too short or prosthesis extrusion occurred after a mean follow-up of 16.9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic malleostapedotomy as a primary intervention is a safe and reliable procedure and is a technique of choice in selected cases of stapes fixation with incus anomaly.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Endoscopic Malleostapedotomy in Primary Stapes Surgery: Preliminary Results
- Date Crossref
- 20/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.