Assessing the Printability of Rene 65 Powder for Repairing Degraded GTD 111 Gas Turbine Blades Using L-DED and L-PBF
Rattachement africain : co, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Restoring components in the hot gas path of turbine engines after service-induced degradation is crucial for economic efficiency. This study investigates the printability of Rene 65 powder on a degraded first-stage turbine blade using two additive manufacturing techniques: Laser Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) and Laser Powder Directed Energy Deposition (L-DED). Deposited material was evaluated using optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) to characterize its crystallographic texture, while microhardness testing provided insight into its mechanical properties. Our results show that L-PBF excels at replicating intricate features, such as small cooling holes, and produces a highly texturized microstructure oriented parallel to <001> under optimal parameters (80 W, 400 mm/s, unidirectional scanning), although at a slower pace. In contrast, L-DED offers a versatile, rapid, and cost-effective method for repairing medium to large parts, yielding an equiaxed microstructure and higher as-printed hardness—approaching GTD 111 values due to an aging effect from high heat input. Both processes effectively restored the dimensional integrity of degraded blade tips, paving the way for more sustainable and economical maintenance strategies in the aerospace industry.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Assessing the Printability of Rene 65 Powder for Repairing Degraded GTD 111 Gas Turbine Blades Using L-DED and L-PBF
- Date Crossref
- 30/03/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.