PCD-CTVersusEID-CT in Imaging of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Prospective Comparative Pilot Study
Rattachement africain : se. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND/AIM: Photon-counting detector computerised tomography (PCD-CT) is a novel imaging technique that may be beneficial in diagnostics and follow-up of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective pilot including eight patients with confirmed PDAC was designed. Patients underwent conventional energy integrating detector CT (EID-CT) and PCD-CT, and corresponding arterial and venous phase images were compared in quantitative and qualitative manners. Five independent and method blinded reviewers scored each intra-individual pair of images. RESULTS: =0.003, 0.001, and 0.040, respectively). There was a non-significant tendency towards better edge sharpness in the PCD-CT images. Qualitative assessments of image quality revealed minor differences in some aspects of arterial phase, favouring the conventional EID-CT, however no statistically significant differences in terms of overall or venous phase parameters between the methods were evident. CONCLUSION: PCD-CT offers a novel method with potential benefits in imaging of pancreatic tumours. Further development of the protocol, including optimisation and validation in larger cohorts of patients, are necessary to define a potential role of PCD-CT in the management of PDAC.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- PCD-CT<i>Versus</i>EID-CT in Imaging of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Prospective Comparative Pilot Study
- Date Crossref
- 28/03/2025
- Éditeur
- International Institute of Anticancer Research
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.