NMR Crystallography in Pharmaceutical Development
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
NMR crystallography is the combined use of experimental solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) with density-functional theory (DFT) calculation of NMR parameters for a structure, as obtained, for example, by complementary diffraction or crystal structure prediction (CSP) approaches. We give an overview of how NMR crystallography can be applied to active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) and their formulations, including considering polymorphism, solvates and hydrates, salt and co-crystal formation, and amorphous dispersions. Specifically, the use of the gauge-including projector augmented wave (GIPAW) method, as implemented, e.g., in CASTEP or Quantum Espresso, is widely employed to calculate NMR chemical shifts for nuclei such as 1H, 13C, 14/15N, 19F and 35Cl, as well as quadrupolar parameters for spin I ≥ 1 nuclei such as 14N and 35Cl, complementing experimental data obtained using magic-angle spinning (MAS). We describe the application of key MAS NMR experiments such as cross-polarisation (CP) MAS, notably for polymorph fingerprinting and determination of the number of distinct molecules in the asymmetric unit cell (Z′), and 1H-based two-dimensional experiments including heteronuclear correlation and double-quantum (DQ) MAS. Experiments probing internuclear dipolar couplings provide structural insight via identifying specific atomic proximities and determining specific distances and characterise dynamic processes via quantitative measurement of dipolar couplings.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- NMR Crystallography in Pharmaceutical Development
- Date Crossref
- 31/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Royal Society of Chemistry
- Type
- book-chapter
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.