Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Quality Difference Analysis Among Soy Whey Produced by Different Processing Methods

2Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT The objective of this study was to analyse the difference in sensory flavour and volatile compounds among the three processing methods of soy whey, as well as to establish an evaluation model representing the correlation between sensory flavour and volatile compounds. The results showed that the soy whey produced by the boiling‐to‐filtering method (BFM) exhibited a higher total soluble solid (TSS) content and total flavonoid content (TFC) compared to that of the repeated boiling‐to‐filtering method (RBFM) and the filtering‐to‐boiling method (FBM), while RBFM soy whey showed a higher total protein content (TPC). The sensory analysis showed that the FBM soy whey exhibited an intense beany flavour and grease odour. The SPME/GC–MS results showed that FBM soy whey exhibited more categories and higher contents of flavour compounds, particularly for alcohols and aldehydes. 1‐Octen‐3‐ol, n‐hexanol, hexanal and nonanal were the main volatile compounds influencing soy whey with different processing methods. The evaluation model revealed that the beany flavour was close to FBM soy whey and highly correlated with 1‐octen‐3‐ol, n‐hexanol, hexanal, heptanal and 2‐ethyl furan. (E, E)‐2,4‐Heptadienal, (E, E)‐2,4‐nonadienal and octanal were close to FBM and highly correlated with grease and bean fragrance. Decanal, ethyl caproate and ethyl caprylate were highly correlated with the floral aroma and close to FBM soy whey. Sweet and fruity aromas were associated with RBFM soy whey and highly correlated with 3‐methyl butanal, (E)‐2‐nonenal and nonanal. The milk aroma was close to BFM soy whey and highly correlated with 2‐ethylfuran, decanal, ethyl caprylate and ethyl caproate. Overall, RBFM and BFM soy whey contained higher levels of protein and flavonoids and exhibited less beany flavour, potentially offering greater nutritional value. In contrast, the FBM soy whey exhibited a higher content of volatile flavour compounds, especially 1‐octen‐3‐ol, n‐hexanol, hexanal and 2‐ethyl furan.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Quality Difference Analysis Among Soy Whey Produced by Different Processing Methods
Date Crossref
29/03/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Food composition and propertiesPhytoestrogen effects and researchFood Quality and Safety Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.