Developmental trajectory of a toddler with PACS1 syndrome: a longitudinal descriptive case study
Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Objectives PACS1 syndrome is a rare genetic neurodevelopmental disorder first described in 2012. Despite its severe impact on both affected individuals and their families, to date, there have been no detailed characterizations of the developmental trajectory of children with PACS1 syndrome. Our work aimed to fill this gap. It also sought to raise awareness of this syndrome.Methods A 24-month-old boy with PACS1 syndrome was longitudinally assessed every 6 months until 48 months of age. His cognitive, motor, linguistic and socio-communicative development, as well as his adaptative behaviour and sensory profile, were assessed using different tools. At 51 months, symptoms compatible with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) were also explored.Results Delays were observed in all the areas assessed but no regression was noticed. Strong difficulties were observed in communication and language. The most notable developmental progression was seen in socialization. Yet, symptomatology of ASD was also observed.Conclusions Consistent results were obtained through the evaluation tools used in the study, but slight differences were also noticed, highlighting the need for a comprehensive battery of different assessment methods. Raise in linguistic development was concurrent to an intervention aimed at promoting parents’ sensitive response to their child’s behaviour.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Developmental trajectory of a toddler with PACS1 syndrome: a longitudinal descriptive case study
- Date Crossref
- 27/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.