Virulence and resistance gene analysis of Rothia nasimurium by whole gene sequencing
Rattachement africain : cn, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
A batch of sheep in a sheep farm in Xinjiang, China, died suddenly; a bacterial strain was isolated from the abdominal fluid of the sick and dead sheep, and identified as Rothia nasimurium by 16S sequencing, and the strain Y1 was subjected to drug sensitivity test with Draft gene sequencing. The results of the drug sensitivity test revealed the strain's resistance to 9 antibiotics, with sensitivity exhibited solely towards amikacin and vancomycin. Phylogenetic tree analysis confirmed that it was related to Rothia nasimurium strain E1706032 and Rothia sp.SD9660Na. The draft genome sequencing results showed that the total length of the gene was 2,387,685 bp, and the GC content was 59.35%. VFDB database analysis identified 112 annotated genes in Y1, including those related to bacterial adhesion, regulation, nutrient metabolism factors, hemolysin, immunomodulation, and iron uptake proteins. CARD database analysis showed that Y1 was resistant to a variety of antibiotics such as glycopeptides, tetracyclines, aminoglycosides and polypeptides. Animal pathogenicity tests have shown that Y1 can cause lung damage, coat loss and skin inflammation. This study revealed a series of virulence and drug resistance genes and pathogenicity of Y1. The results of this study have important reference value for prevention and treatment of Rothia infection in the future.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Virulence and resistance gene analysis of Rothia nasimurium by whole gene sequencing
- Date Crossref
- 27/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.