A robust M-estimation framework for spatial autoregressive models: loss function design and optimization strategies
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models are frequently applied in geographic research to account for spatial dependence. Although robust estimation methods (e.g. M-estimation) within SAR models have been investigated recently, key challenges remain: (1) How should the loss function be rationally designed in M-estimation for SAR models? (2) How can the scale parameter in M-estimation be evaluated? (3) How can the robust optimization problem be solved efficiently? In this research, we derived a closed-form bias-corrected least-squares estimator that outperforms the popular maximum likelihood estimator both numerically and statistically. We replaced the squared Euclidean norm with rational loss functions and then proposed an iteratively re-weighted least-squares scheme to attain a robust solution numerically. Simulation results demonstrate that our robust M-estimators, particularly redescending types, significantly improve estimation accuracy (reducing bias and root-mean-square error) and computational efficiency. In a real-world application with the Boston housing data, our method correctly identifies the underlying 22 outliers and increases the coefficient of determination from 0.78 to 0.90. Our future work will focus on enhancing computational performance through advanced optimization techniques.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A robust M-estimation framework for spatial autoregressive models: loss function design and optimization strategies
- Date Crossref
- 25/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.