Metaproteome analysis of short-term thermal stress in three sympatric coral species reveals divergent host responses
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The accelerating loss of coral reefs worldwide due to anthropogenic climate change has led to a myriad of studies aimed at understanding the basis of coral resilience to support reef conservation. Here, we integrate physiological measurements with proteomic and metabolomic profiles to examine species-specific responses to increased temperature in three sympatric reef-building corals from the Great Barrier Reef: Acropora hyacinthus , Porites lobata , and Stylophora pistillata . We find species-specific stress response strategies with A. hyacinthus , a thermally sensitive species, exhibiting rapid decline in endosymbiont physiology, coupled with a one-third reduction in protein abundance. In contrast, P. lobata displayed a delayed physiological response to stress and a muted proteome response, suggesting greater resilience. S. pistillata initially showed minor shifts in the proteome followed by colony “bail-out”. Overall, we observed markedly different responses in most biochemical pathways in the three coral species. Nonetheless, some known biomarkers of stress, including heat-shock proteins, showed conserved responses to thermal stress with differences in temporal abundance reflecting bleaching resistance. Our results underscore the species-specific nature of coral responses to thermal stress and highlight proteomic signatures associated with symbiosis breakdown, offering mechanistic insights into coral bleaching susceptibility and resilience.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Metaproteome analysis of short-term thermal stress in three sympatric coral species reveals divergent host responses
- Date Crossref
- 26/03/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.