A Rapid Heat‐Enhanced Golgi‐Cox Staining Method for Detailed Neuroanatomical Analysis Coupled With Immunostaining
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The Golgi-Cox staining technique is renowned for its ability to delineate neuronal architecture with remarkable precision. However, the traditional protocol's lengthy processing timeline and limited compatibility with immunostaining and transgenic labeling have hindered its widespread adoption in modern neuroscience research. In the current study, we found that adjusting the incubation temperature to 55°C significantly reduced the staining duration to a mere 24 h for 100 µm-thick sections of mouse brain tissue. Importantly, our optimized protocol is compatible with immunostaining techniques and transgenic mouse models. In addition, using a lipopolysaccharides-induced mouse model of depression, we found a reduction in dendritic spines labeled by Golgi-Cox staining and an increase in the number of microglial cells labeled by immunofluorescence in the same samples, in addition, cross-talk between Golgi-Cox-stained neurons and microglial fibers were observed. In conclusion, the modified Golgi-Cox staining technique allows for the acquisition of a more comprehensive set of data from the same biological tissue with increased efficiency. This advancement promises to improve methodologies in histopathology and neurobiology, making advanced applications of Golgi-Cox staining more accessible in contemporary neuroscience research.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Rapid Heat‐Enhanced Golgi‐Cox Staining Method for Detailed Neuroanatomical Analysis Coupled With Immunostaining
- Date Crossref
- 24/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.