Treatment intensification in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: a real-world study in Alberta, Canada
Résumé fourni par la source
AIM: To assess the current status of and factors associated with treatment intensification (TI) (with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors [ARPIs] and/or docetaxel) for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) in Canada. MATERIALS & METHODS: Retrospective analysis of data for 431 patients with mCSPC from the Alberta Prostate Cancer Research Initiative database (July 2014-March 2022). The primary objective was to assess the patient proportion receiving TI, time to TI, and associated factors. The secondary and exploratory objectives were evaluating TI patterns and factors associated with choice of therapy, respectively. RESULTS: Overall, 42% of patients received TI; most (65%) within 3 months post-index. TI was likely to occur within 3 months post-index in de novo mCSPC, but occurred later for recurrent mCSPC. Patients with recurrent mCSPC (HR [95% CI]: 0.52 [0.38-0.72]) and those aged ≥ 75 years (0.57 [0.36-0.93]) were less likely to receive TI. Patients with multiple metastatic sites and bone metastasis had a 2-3-fold higher likelihood of receiving TI. An ARPI was predominantly used (75%) for TI (median duration: 16.0 months). CONCLUSION: TI rates for mCSPC are suboptimal in Canada especially for older patients and those with recurrent mCSPC. TI prioritization in such groups may improve patient outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Treatment intensification in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: a real-world study in Alberta, Canada
- Date Crossref
- 24/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.