Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Challenges in Implementing Endoscopic Artificial Intelligence: The Impact of Real‐World Imaging Conditions on Barrett's Neoplasia Detection

15Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic deep learning systems are often developed using high-quality imagery obtained from expert centers. Therefore, they may underperform in community hospitals where image quality is more heterogeneous. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify the performance degradation of a computer aided detection system for Barrett's neoplasia, trained on expert images, when exposed to more heterogeneous imaging conditions representative of daily clinical practice. Further, we evaluated strategies to mitigate this performance loss. METHODS: We developed a computer aided detection system using 1011 high-quality, expert-acquired images from 373 Barrett's patients. We assessed its performance on high, moderate and low image quality test sets, each containing images from an independent group of 117 Barrett's patients. These test sets reflected the varied image quality of routine patient care and contained artefacts such as insufficient mucosal cleaning and inadequate esophageal expansion. We then applied three methods to improve the algorithm's robustness to data heterogeneity: inclusion of more diverse training data, domain-specific pretraining and architectural optimization. RESULTS: The computer aided detection system, when trained exclusively on high-quality data, achieved area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity scores of 83%, 85% and 67% on the high quality test set. AUC and sensitivity were significantly lower with 80% (p < 0.001) and 62% (p = 0.002) on the moderate-quality and 71% (p > 0.001) and 47% (p = 0.002) on the low-quality test set. Incorporating robustness-enhancing strategies significantly improved the AUC, sensitivity and specificity to 92% (p = 0.004), 88% (p = 0.84) and 81% (p = 0.003) on the high-quality test set, 93% (p = 0.006), 86% (p = 0.01) and 83% (p = 0.09) on the moderate-quality test set and 84% (p = 0.001), 78% (p = 0.002) and 77% (p = 0.23) on the low-quality test set. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic deep learning systems trained solely on high-quality images may not perform well when exposed to heterogeneous imagery, as found in routine practice. Robustness-enhancing training strategies can increase the likelihood of successful clinical implementation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Challenges in Implementing Endoscopic Artificial Intelligence: The Impact of Real‐World Imaging Conditions on Barrett's Neoplasia Detection
Date Crossref
21/03/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • University of Amsterdam Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Amsterdam Gastroenterology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Eindhoven University of Technology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Amsterdam Gastroenterology — University of Amsterdam et Eindhoven University of Technology.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Esophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentColorectal Cancer Screening and DetectionAI in cancer detection

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.