ASFRM: An Array State Self-feedback-Based Self-reconfiguration Mechanism in a Reconfigurable Array Processor
Résumé fourni par la source
With complex tasks in neural network computing, existing reconfiguration methods have a long reconfiguration time and it is not easy to achieve fast task switching. Therefore, this paper presents an array state self-feedback based self-reconfiguration mechanism (ASFRM) to quickly achieve autonomous task switching and dynamic scheduling based on task execution status. This mechanism is based on the array state information autonomously fed back by the reconfigurable array, and the host controller makes autonomous judgments and decisions on the current execution status of the array, achieving dynamic task rearrangement, dynamic scheduling of the array and fast task switching. The proposed ASFRM can switch configurations between different tasks within 6 clock cycles. To verify the correctness and efficiency of ASFRM, we modeled the hardware with synthesizable RTL encoding and implemented it on FPGA and chip. The experimental results show that compared with traditional reconfiguration methods and SIMD-like methods, ASFRM can effectively reduce reconfiguration overhead. The volume of bits in the configuration file has decreased by an average of 11.79% and 4.51%. The reconfiguration time has decreased by an average of 52.79% and 37.12%. Based on the UMC 55[Formula: see text]nm process, the operating frequency can reach 400[Formula: see text]MHz. Meanwhile, the chip area is 64[Formula: see text]mm2 and the throughput is 115.2[Formula: see text]GOPS.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- ASFRM: An Array State Self-feedback-Based Self-reconfiguration Mechanism in a Reconfigurable Array Processor
- Date Crossref
- 29/05/2025
- Éditeur
- World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.