An Expanded Access Protocol of RNS60 in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
AIMS: mouse model and was safe and well tolerated both in an open-label pilot study and a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 2 trial in people living with ALS. The objective of this ongoing expanded access protocol (EAP) was to provide RNS60 to people living with ALS who are ineligible for controlled clinical trials and to collect data on the safety and tolerability of dosing RNS60 via twice-daily nebulization rather than the previously studied daily nebulization with weekly intravenous administration. METHODS: Eligible participants (≥ 18 years old, diagnosed with ALS per investigator assessment, and ineligible for an ALS clinical trial testing RNS60) were treated with twice-daily nebulization of RNS60 at home. Safety was evaluated by the assessment of adverse events and routine safety labs. RESULTS: A total of 84 participants have been treated with RNS60 via nebulization twice daily for up to 48 months so far. The most common treatment-related adverse event was increased secretions [N = 27 (32%)]. Serious adverse events (SAEs) [69 occurrences; N = 38 (45%) with at least one SAE] and deaths [N = 24 (28%)] were deemed not related to RNS60. DISCUSSION: This EAP supports the benign side effect profile of RNS60 when administered via twice-daily nebulization and demonstrates the feasibility of long-term EAPs as a complementary approach to controlled trials in people with advanced ALS.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- An Expanded Access Protocol of <scp>RNS60</scp> in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
- Date Crossref
- 21/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.