Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Community‐Based Lung Cancer Screening Program Structure, Quality, and Barriers: The Struggle for Implementation

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objectives: Recommendations for programmatic components for lung cancer screening programs (LCSPs) have been published; however, adoption within LCSPs has not been mandated and implementation requires resources. We aimed to determine the presence of recommended structural and quality elements within LCSPs and determine barriers to performing LCS within a community‐based, multistate healthcare network. Methods: We conducted a cross‐sectional study using two structured interviews within a community‐based healthcare network between 1 June 2018 and 31 July 2020. Two separate interviews were created, one delivered to LCSP navigators to determine the presence of recommended structural and quality elements within LCSPs and one delivered to imaging center administrators to determine barriers to LCS implementation. Results: Of the 22 LCSPs, 20 (91%) were decentralized and 2 (9%) centralized. Three (14%) utilized standardized shared decision‐making tools and 13 (59%) a multidisciplinary nodule review. Of the 21 (95%) LCSPs who collected information for external purposes, 9 (43%) collected it manually. Ten (45%) utilized a standard procedure for smoking cessation, and 5 (23%) had Certified Tobacco Treatment Specialists. Of the 31 affiliated imaging sites not associated with a LCSP, 8 (26%) were performing LCS. While 19 (61%) sites had the resources to fulfill or maintain an increase in LCS orders, lack of resources was the predominant (11, 35%) barrier to implementing a LCSP. Conclusions: A wide variation in the structure, quality, and resource allocation was identified within the network of LCSPs. Further research identifying the implications this variation has on outcomes, operational cost, and experience may shed light on whether stringent program quality control is needed.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Community‐Based Lung Cancer Screening Program Structure, Quality, and Barriers: The Struggle for Implementation
Date Crossref
01/01/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Swedish Medical Center Department of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Medical University of South Carolina Department of Medicine pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure

Department of Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology — Swedish Medical Center et Department of Medicine — Medical University of South Carolina.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Lung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningHead and Neck Cancer Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.