Standardised operating procedures for recommendations in the field of physical and rehabilitation medicine
Rattachement africain : fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: There is an outstanding increased demand for recommendations in the rehabilitation field. Over 600 recommendation articles have been published in the last decade, primarily by groups of authors based on unclear criteria and only a few by learned societies based on standardized methods. OBJECTIVES: In 2007, the French Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SOFMER) published a methodology to establish recommendations in physical and rehabilitation medicine (PRM). This framework, which served to publish 22 sets of management recommendations, must be reworked to meet new international methods for elaborating recommendations. Therefore, our objectives were: 1) to elaborate an updated methodology to enhance the dissemination and implementation of SOFMER-endorsed recommendations, and 2) to standardize and report in sufficient detail the successive steps from the elaboration of these recommendations to the evaluation of their impact and provide supporting tools to guide developers. METHODS: At the SOFMER's request, a steering committee assembled, consisting of 7 PRM senior physicians with experience in elaborating, disseminating, implementing and/or evaluating recommendations in the field of PRM. They conducted a non-systematic literature review to identify methodologies and standardized operating procedures previously published by scientific societies in France and overseas. Available information regarding strategies for elaboration, dissemination, implementation and evaluation of the recommendations, scientific valorization and business models was retrieved. Participants in previous recommendations were also interviewed regardless of their field. RESULTS: We identified 4 common key steps: preparation, elaboration, valorization and evaluation, usually scheduled according to an 18- to 24-month timetable. We divided these 4 steps into 9 sub-steps, each of which was standardized and described in detail. The steering committee also elaborated a specific editorial process for publishing recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: This novel SOFMER methodology was designed to draw up high-level recommendations for the field of PRM and, more generally, for rehabilitation practices, facilitating their implementation. Standardization of operating procedures should provide guidance to authors to achieve replicable and high-quality recommendations.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Standardised operating procedures for recommendations in the field of physical and rehabilitation medicine
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Délégation Paris 5 pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Inserm pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Université Paris Cité pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Health and Functional Exposomics pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Handicap pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Université de Limoges pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Université Paris-Saclay Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisme public
-
Institut de Recherche en Informatique et Systèmes Aléatoires pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
Délégation Paris 5, Inserm et Université Paris Cité, avec 9 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.