Spectroscopic Calculation of Band Alignment Between High Permittivity Composites ZrSiO, AlSiO and β-Ga2O3
Résumé fourni par la source
Monoclinic gallium oxide (β-Ga2O3) combined with high permittivity composites (such as HfZrO, HfAlO, et al.) has exhibited great potential for promote performance and stability of power transistors. In this study, the ZrSiO/β-Ga2O3, AlSiO/β-Ga2O3 heterojunctions are fabricated by low-pressure chemical vapor deposition (LPCVD) and radio frequency magnetron sputtering. The interfacial chemical properties, crystalline structures, surface morphologies, and band alignments of ZrSiO/β-Ga2O3, AlSiO/β-Ga2O3 have been analyzed by various measurements. Both ZrSiO, AlSiO, and β-Ga2O3 films own great crystal quality, and a smooth surface with low roughness. Based in the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), the valence band offset (ΔE v ) of ZrSiO/β-Ga2O3, AlSiO/β-Ga2O3 is estimated to be 0.41 ± 0.03, 0.76 ± 0.02 eV, respectively, using the Ga 2p, Al 2p, Si 2p and Zr 3d core levels as references. It is found that both ZrSiO/β-Ga2O3, and AlSiO/β-Ga2O3 heterojunction show a straddling type I alignment with large conduction band offset (ΔE c ) of 1.74 ± 0.03, 2.30 ± 0.02 eV, respectively. These results demonstrate that feasibility of ZrSiO/β-Ga2O3, AlSiO/β-Ga2O3 heterojunctions with a type I band alignment, sufficient band offsets, smooth surface, and decent film quality, which could be one of the promising candidates for developing high performance β-Ga2O3 devices and power applications.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Spectroscopic Calculation of Band Alignment Between High Permittivity Composites ZrSiO, AlSiO and <i>β</i>-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2025
- Éditeur
- The Electrochemical Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.