Autosomal dominant HK1-related neurodevelopmental disorder with visual defects and brain anomalies (NEDVIBA): An emerging mitochondrial disorder
Résumé fourni par la source
Purpose: ) encodes a ubiquitously expressed hexokinase, which is responsible for the first step of glycolysis, phosphorylation of glucose to glucose-6-phosphate. Both autosomal recessive and dominant variants in this gene have previously been shown to cause human disease, and presently, there are clinical data available for 27 individuals with the monoallelic neurodevelopmental disorder with visual defects and brain anomalies. Delineation of the entire phenotypic spectrum and genotype-phenotype relations will aid in management and counseling decisions. Methods: . We also reviewed data from the published literature. Results: The clinical manifestations of neurodevelopmental disorder with visual defects and brain anomalies include varying degrees of intellectual disability/developmental delay, hypotonia, epileptic encephalopathy, visual deficits, a Leigh syndrome spectrum pattern on brain magnetic resonance imaging, and elevated lactate in blood and cerebrospinal fluid, suggesting mitochondrial dysfunction. Based on severity, individuals can be classified into mild, moderate, severe, or lethal forms. In terms of genotype-phenotype correlation, we find that all individuals carrying a missense variant at the threonine 457 residue have severe clinical features. Conclusion: should be included in mitochondrial disorder gene sequencing panels.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Autosomal dominant HK1-related neurodevelopmental disorder with visual defects and brain anomalies (NEDVIBA): An emerging mitochondrial disorder
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.