Breeding for sustainability: Development of an index to reduce greenhouse gas in dairy cattle

Le résumé fourni par la source

• The index includes traits for emissions, efficiency, and longevity. • The index reduces emissions by 169 kg CO 2 equivalents per SD of selection. • Adding a methane trait further reduces emissions by 30 kg CO 2 equivalents yearly. • Omission of methane traits weakens cows’ genetic ability to cut methane output. • Genetic selection cuts dairy emissions with minimal extra cost or labour for farmers. Several genetic selection strategies can be incorporated into dairy cattle breeding programmes to target a reduction in greenhouse gas ( GHG ) emissions and provide a mitigation strategy with only modest additional cost, or labour expense, to the dairy producer. This can be achieved by targeting genetic progress in a specific trait (i.e. methane) or by building selection indexes that balance economic gain and environmental impact for more conventional traits, or both. Various countries have initiated efforts to incorporate emission-related traits into their national selection indexes. The strategies for reducing emissions vary due to system-specific objectives and limitations, ranging from specific methane breeding values to broader sustainability indexes. While methane breeding values may not be commercially available in most cases, Canada has taken the lead as the first country to release a methane breeding value, developed using mid-IR spectral data from milk samples and GreenFeed phenotyped Holstein cows, and develop a GHG index which includes a direct methane trait. The GHG index proposed for commercialisation is expected to reduce emissions per cow per year by 168 kg CO 2 e per SD of index, and is composed of Herd Life, Feed Efficiency, Methane Efficiency, and Body Maintenance Requirement traits. The reduction in emissions is largely driven by a genetic gain in Methane Efficiency and Body Maintenance Requirements, with results indicating that omission of a direct methane trait from the index would lead to an unfavourable response in individual cow’s own genetic potential to reduce enteric methane output. Other countries are also progressing on this front; Spain has developed a methane estimated breeding value ( EBV ) and the Netherlands and Denmark are set to publish methane EBV in 2025. Motivation for the use of GHG indexes is strengthening in high−income countries. This motivation could be greatly accelerated if auditable, transparent and scientifically robust ways of recognising emissions changes due to genetic selection were developed. Ideally, these methods would support both national policy setting and supply agreements with milk processors.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.