Cas12a-knock-in mice for multiplexed genome editing, disease modelling and immune-cell engineering
Rattachement africain : us, cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The pleiotropic effects of human disease and the complex nature of gene-interaction networks require knock-in mice allowing for multiplexed gene perturbations. Here we describe a series of knock-in mice with a C57BL/6 background and with the conditional or constitutive expression of LbCas12a or of high-fidelity enhanced AsCas12a, which were inserted at the Rosa26 locus. The constitutive expression of Cas12a in the mice did not lead to discernible pathology and enabled efficient multiplexed genome engineering. We used the mice for the retrovirus-based immune-cell engineering of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells and bone-marrow-derived dendritic cells, for autochthonous cancer modelling through the delivery of multiple CRISPR RNAs as a single array using adeno-associated viruses, and for the targeted genome editing of liver tissue using lipid nanoparticles. We also describe a system for simultaneous dual-gene activation and knockout (DAKO). The Cas12a-knock-in mice and the viral and non-viral delivery vehicles provide a versatile toolkit for ex vivo and in vivo applications in genome editing, disease modelling and immune-cell engineering, and for the deconvolution of complex gene interactions. Knock-in mice conditionally or constitutively expressing Cas12 variants enable a wide range of ex vivo and in vivo applications requiring multiplexed genome engineering.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Cas12a-knock-in mice for multiplexed genome editing, disease modelling and immune-cell engineering
- Date Crossref
- 20/03/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.